04-09-2017, 05:38 PM
My address was to Fenrir.
Cutting costs of production may not be relevant at the moment according to your allegations, but that does not mean we should make ourselves short sighted. Setting a standardized price range for goods, and assuring fair trade is a far more functional system, if people wish act alone and undercut rate alone, they may do so, alone.
I you in this hypothetical proposal came to hold a monopoly of an item of use, the actions and recourse in response are extremely variable. If you help a item of significance in a time of dire need that threatened the lives of everyone in the town yet still you refused to release it, than it is only suitable that militant action be taken against you. Under less extreme conditions, a monopoly would be entirely allowable if the one holding it had to adhere to a standardized fair range of price, especially if the item held is a necessity.
You can hold you monopoly, you can become fat and wealthy from it if are so inclined, but you cannot do so at the price of the health and well beings of others. It is unacceptable to let one persons unnecessary profit and spoils come at the price of the suffering, exploitation, and maltreatment of others.
We can have a fair and healthy economy, while allowing people to still follow their own ventures and passions, it is all a matter of compensation, communication and understanding.
Cutting costs of production may not be relevant at the moment according to your allegations, but that does not mean we should make ourselves short sighted. Setting a standardized price range for goods, and assuring fair trade is a far more functional system, if people wish act alone and undercut rate alone, they may do so, alone.
I you in this hypothetical proposal came to hold a monopoly of an item of use, the actions and recourse in response are extremely variable. If you help a item of significance in a time of dire need that threatened the lives of everyone in the town yet still you refused to release it, than it is only suitable that militant action be taken against you. Under less extreme conditions, a monopoly would be entirely allowable if the one holding it had to adhere to a standardized fair range of price, especially if the item held is a necessity.
You can hold you monopoly, you can become fat and wealthy from it if are so inclined, but you cannot do so at the price of the health and well beings of others. It is unacceptable to let one persons unnecessary profit and spoils come at the price of the suffering, exploitation, and maltreatment of others.
We can have a fair and healthy economy, while allowing people to still follow their own ventures and passions, it is all a matter of compensation, communication and understanding.